The Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network Analysis
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
The Global Research Collaboration of Network Meta-Analysis: A Social Network Analysis
Authors
Keywords
Comparative effectiveness research, Meta-analysis, Scientists, Canada, Social networks, Centrality, Scientific publishing, Network analysis
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages e0163239
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2016-09-30
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0163239
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
- (2016) David Moher et al. LANCET
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition
- (2015) Christopher J L Murray et al. LANCET
- Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013
- (2015) Mohammad H Forouzanfar et al. LANCET
- An Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Published Network Meta-Analyses: A Systematic Review
- (2015) James D. Chambers et al. PLoS One
- Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: a social network analysis
- (2014) Ferrán Catalá-López et al. BMC Medicine
- Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian
- (2014) Lun Li et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set
- (2014) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis
- (2014) John P A Ioannidis et al. LANCET
- The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement
- (2014) Brian Hutton et al. PLoS One
- Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
- (2014) A. Bafeta et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis
- (2013) Andrea Cipriani et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Research collaboration in health management research communities
- (2013) Chichen Zhang et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1
- (2013) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
- (2013) A. Bafeta et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2
- (2012) Sofia Dias et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Cultural history holds back Chinese research
- (2012) Peng Gong NATURE
- Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed
- (2011) Tianjing Li et al. BMC Medicine
- Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1
- (2011) Jeroen P. Jansen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
- (2010) Sarah Donegan et al. PLoS One
- An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies
- (2009) Margaret Sampson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science
- (2008) B. F. Jones et al. SCIENCE
- How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses
- (2008) Sergio Sismondo SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: A qualitative systematic review
- (2007) Sergio Sismondo Contemporary Clinical Trials
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started