4.2 Article

Tract-Specific Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Before and After Decompressive Spinal Surgery: Preliminary Results

Journal

CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 61-69

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-015-0418-7

Keywords

Diffusion tensor imaging; Spinal cord; Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc.
  2. National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health [UL1T000424]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics of the cervical spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were compared to those measured in healthy volunteers, using tract-specific region of interests (ROIs) across all cervical intervertebral disc levels. Methods Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the cervical spinal cord was performed in four patients with CSM and in five healthy volunteers on a 3-T MR scanner. Region-specific fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated on axial imaging with ROI placement in the anterior, lateral, and posterior regions of the spinal cord. FA and MD were also calculated on sagittal acquisitions. Non-parametric statistical tests were used to compare controls and patients before and after surgery. Results FA values were significantly lower (p=0.050) and MD values were significantly higher (p=0.014) in CSM patients measured at level of maximal compression before surgery than in healthy controls in lateral and posterior ROIs, respectively. In posterior ROIs, MD values were significantly higher in patients before surgery compared to controls at all levels except C7-T1. Conclusion Patients with CSM may demonstrate region-specific changes in DTI metrics when compared to healthy controls. Changes in DTI metrics may also occur at levels remote from site of compression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available