4.6 Article

The Earthworm Eisenia fetida Can Help Desalinate a Coastal Saline Soil in Tianjin, North China

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144709

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare Development and Application of Technology of Converting Forestry Waste into Growing Media [201504205]
  2. Graduate Training and Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education Application of Earthworms and Green Waste Compost in Saline Soil Amelioration of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Coastal Area [BLCXY201604]
  3. Shandong ShengWei Gardening Technology Co., Ltd.
  4. Tianjin JiaLiMing Biological Technology Co., Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A laboratory microcosm experiment was conducted to determine whether the earthworm Eisenia fetida could survive in a saline soil from a field site in North China, and an experiment using response surface methodology was conducted at that field site to quantify the effects of E. fetida and green waste compost (GWC) on the salt content of the soil. The microcosm results showed that E. fetida survived in GWC-amended saline soil and increased the contents of humic acid, available N, and available P in the GWC-amended soil. The data from the field experiment were described by the following second-order model: y = -1.76+0.091x(1)+0: 48x(2)-0.00083x(1)x(2)-0.00078x(1)(2)-0.022x(2)(2), where y is the decrease in soil salinity (g of salt per kg of dry soil) relative to the untreated control, x(1) is the number of E. fetida added per m(2), and x(2) is the quantity of GWC added in kg per m(2). The model predicted that the total salt content of the saline soil would decrease by >2 g kg(-1) (p<0.05) when 29-90 individuals m(-2) of E. fetida and 6.1-15.0 kg m(-2) of GWC were applied. We conclude that the use of E. fetida for soil desalination is promising and warrants additional investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available