Effectiveness of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Effectiveness of Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Keywords
Surgical and invasive medical procedures, Stenosis, Laminectomy, Medical devices and equipment, Spinal fusion, Adverse events, Randomized controlled trials, Systematic reviews
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages e0122800
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2015-03-31
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0122800
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Interspinous Spacer versus Traditional Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Ai-Min Wu et al. PLoS One
- Use of placebo controls in the evaluation of surgery: systematic review
- (2014) K. Wartolowska et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial
- (2013) Reginald Davis et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study
- (2013) Y. Ishimoto et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Decompression Provides Equivalent Outcomes to Conventional Midline Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis
- (2013) S. Rajasekaran et al. SPINE
- Interspinous Spacers Compared With Decompression or Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis
- (2013) Richard A. Deyo et al. SPINE
- Modified Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2013) Xinyu Liu et al. SPINE
- X-Stop Versus Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication
- (2013) Björn H. Strömqvist et al. SPINE
- Decompression and Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization Compared With Decompression and Instrumented Spinal Fusion for Spinal Stenosis and Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
- (2013) Reginald J. Davis et al. SPINE
- Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial
- (2013) W. A. Moojen et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Growth in the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and use of the PEDro scale
- (2012) Mark R Elkins et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- Is surgery more effective than non-surgical treatment for spinal stenosis, and which non-surgical treatment is more effective? A systematic review
- (2012) Stephen May et al. Physiotherapy
- Patterns of Care After Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine in Primary Care
- (2012) John J. You et al. SPINE
- Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2011) Wouter A. Moojen et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome
- (2011) Fredrik Strömqvist et al. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
- The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study
- (2011) Natalie A. de Morton AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
- Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2011) Francisco M. Kovacs et al. SPINE
- Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview
- (2011) Su Golder et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Trends, Major Medical Complications, and Charges Associated With Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults
- (2010) Richard A. Deyo JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process–splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study
- (2010) Kota Watanabe et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Microdecompressive Laminatomy With a 5-year Follow-up Period for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2010) Suat Erol Çelik et al. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES
- Dynamic Stabilization Using X-stop Versus Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Canal Stenosis; Comparative Study of the Clinical Outcome
- (2010) Alaa Azzazi et al. NEUROSURGERY QUARTERLY
- Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis
- (2009) Mitsuru Yagi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- Surgical treatment for lumbar lateral recess stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
- (2009) Sebastian Ruetten et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
- A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures
- (2009) Rachelle Buchbinder et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- (2008) James N. Weinstein et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More