4.6 Article

Instability in the COPD Diagnosis upon Repeat Testing Vary with the Definition of COPD

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121832

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Asociacion Latinoamericana de Torax (ALAT)
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background A low FEV1/FVC from post-bronchodilator spirometry is required to diagnose COPD. Both the FEV1 and the FVC can vary over time; therefore, individuals can be given a diagnosis of mild COPD at one visit, but have normal spirometry during the next appointment, even without an intervention. Methods We analyzed two population-based surveys of adults with spirometry carried out for the same individuals 5-9 years after their baseline examination. We determined the factors associated with a change in the spirometry interpretation from one exam to the next utilizing different criteria commonly used to diagnose COPD. Results The rate of an inconsistent diagnosis of mild COPD was 11.7% using FEV1/FVC <0.70, 5.9% using FEV1/FEV6 < the lower limit of the normal range, LLN and 4.1% using the GOLD stage 2-4 criterion. The most important factor associated with diagnostic inconsistency was the closeness of the ratio to the LLN during the first examination. Inconsistency decreased with a lower FEV1. Conclusions Using FEV1/FEV6 < LLN or GOLD stage 2-4 as the criterion for airflow obstruction reduces inconsistencies in the diagnosis of mild COPD. Further improvement could be obtained by defining a borderline zone around the LLN (e.g. plus or minus 0.6 SD), or repeating the test in patients with borderline results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available