4.6 Article

Reliability of Resting-State Microstate Features in Electroencephalography

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114163

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [CIHR - 201102MFE-246635-181538]
  2. Sidney R. Baer Jr. Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01HD069776, R01NS073601, R21 MH099196, R21 NS082870, R21 NS085491, R21 HD07616]
  4. Harvard Catalyst - The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NCRR)
  5. Harvard Catalyst - The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NCATS NIH) [M01-RR-01066, UL1 RR025758]
  6. Temerty Family through the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Electroencephalographic (EEG) microstate analysis is a method of identifying quasi-stable functional brain states (microstates) that are altered in a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers of neurophysiological health and disease. However, use of EEG microstates as neurophysiological biomarkers requires assessment of the test-retest reliability of microstate analysis. Methods: We analyzed resting-state, eyes-closed, 30-channel EEG from 10 healthy subjects over 3 sessions spaced approximately 48 hours apart. We identified four microstate classes and calculated the average duration, frequency, and coverage fraction of these microstates. Using Cronbach's alpha and the standard error of measurement (SEM) as indicators of reliability, we examined: (1) the test-retest reliability of microstate features using a variety of different approaches; (2) the consistency between TAAHC and k-means clustering algorithms; and (3) whether microstate analysis can be reliably conducted with 19 and 8 electrodes. Results: The approach of identifying a single set of global microstate maps showed the highest reliability (mean Cronbach's alpha>0.8, SEM approximate to 10% of mean values) compared to microstates derived by each session or each recording. There was notably low reliability in features calculated from maps extracted individually for each recording, suggesting that the analysis is most reliable when maps are held constant. Features were highly consistent across clustering methods (Cronbach's alpha>0.9). All features had high test-retest reliability with 19 and 8 electrodes. Conclusions: High test-retest reliability and cross-method consistency of microstate features suggests their potential as biomarkers for assessment of the brain's neurophysiological health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available