What Determines the Duration of War? Insights from Assessment Strategies in Animal Contests
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What Determines the Duration of War? Insights from Assessment Strategies in Animal Contests
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages e108491
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-09-24
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0108491
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Increased aggression during human group contests when competitive ability is more similar
- (2012) G. Stulp et al. Biology Letters
- Size distribution and battles in wood ants: group resource-holding potential is the sum of the individual parts
- (2011) Tim P. Batchelor et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- The logical polyp: assessments and decisions during contests in the beadlet anemone Actinia equina
- (2011) Fabian S. Rudin et al. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
- Flexing the abdominals: do bigger muscles make better fighters?
- (2011) S. L. Mowles et al. Biology Letters
- Costly punishment prevails in intergroup conflict
- (2011) L. Saaksvuori et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Fight tactics in wood ants: individuals in smaller groups fight harder but die faster
- (2011) T. P. Batchelor et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Group territoriality and the benefits of sociality in the African lion, Panthera leo
- (2009) Anna Mosser et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests
- (2009) Gareth Arnott et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
- (2009) Benjamin M. Bolker et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus
- (2008) Yuying Hsu et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests
- (2008) Gareth Arnott et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- A winner effect supports third-party intervention behaviour during fallow deer, Dama dama, fights
- (2008) Domhnall J. Jennings et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests
- (2008) Mark Briffa et al. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- Decisions during fights in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: mutual or self assessment of energy, weapons and size?
- (2007) Mark Briffa ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
- What factors contribute to an ownership advantage?
- (2007) S.A Fayed et al. Biology Letters
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started