Comparative Analysis of Three Different Methods for Monitoring the Use of Green Bridges by Wildlife

Piloting a Non-Invasive Genetic Sampling Method for Evaluating Population-Level Benefits of Wildlife Crossing Structures

(2016) Anthony P. Clevenger et al.   ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY

Optimising Camera Traps for Monitoring Small Mammals

(2013) Alistair S. Glen et al.   PLoS One

Performance of camera trapping and track counts for surveying large mammals in rainforest remnants

(2011) Karina Dias Espartosa et al.   BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION

A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities

(2010) Natasha De Bondi et al.   WILDLIFE RESEARCH

Ability of Wildlife Overpasses to Provide Connectivity and Prevent Genetic Isolation

(2009) LUCA CORLATTI et al.   CONSERVATION BIOLOGY

Comparison of Methods of Monitoring Wildlife Crossing-Structures on Highways

(2009) Adam T. Ford et al.   JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT

Roads as barriers to animal movement in fragmented landscapes

(2008) D. B. Shepard et al.   ANIMAL CONSERVATION

The permeability of highway in Gorski kotar (Croatia) for large mammals

(2008) Josip Kusak et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH

Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals: camera traps and track plots

(2008) Maria Carolina Lyra-Jorge et al.   EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH

Effectiveness of a highway overpass to promote landscape connectivity and movement of moose and roe deer in Sweden

(2008) Mattias P.O. Olsson et al.   LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING

Camera Trapping of Carnivores: Trap Success Among Camera Types and Across Species, and Habitat Selection by Species, on Salt Pond Mountain, Giles County, Virginia

(2008) Marcella J. Kelly et al.   NORTHEASTERN NATURALIST