Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials

Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials

(2013) Jelena Savović et al.   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Classification systems to improve assessment of risk of bias

(2012) Isabelle Boutron et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs

(2012) Lisa Hartling et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials

(2010) Catherine E. Hewitt et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research

(2010) Susan Armijo-Olivo et al.   JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group

(2009) Andrea D. Furlan et al.   SPINE

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies

(2008) Andreas Lundh et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

(2008) Lesley Wood et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal