- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Multi-Modal Glioblastoma Segmentation: Man versus Machine
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages e96873
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-05-08
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0096873
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Impact of MRI head placement on glioma response assessment
- (2014) Martin Reuter et al. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
- Sketch-Based Editing Tools for Tumour Segmentation in 3D Medical Images
- (2013) Frank Heckel et al. COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM
- Surgery for low-grade glioma infiltrating the central cerebral region: location as a predictive factor for neurological deficit, epileptological outcome, and quality of life
- (2013) Philippe Schucht et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
- A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
- (2013) Stefan Bauer et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- Segmentation editing improves efficiency while reducing inter-expert variation and maintaining accuracy for normal brain tissues in the presence of space-occupying lesions
- (2013) M A Deeley et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- MR Imaging Predictors of Molecular Profile and Survival: Multi-institutional Study of the TCGA Glioblastoma Data Set
- (2013) David A. Gutman et al. RADIOLOGY
- GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platform
- (2013) Jan Egger et al. Scientific Reports
- GLISTR: Glioma Image Segmentation and Registration
- (2012) A. Gooya et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
- The warning-sign hierarchy between quantitative subcortical motor mapping and continuous motor evoked potential monitoring during resection of supratentorial brain tumors
- (2012) Kathleen Seidel et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
- 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network
- (2012) Andriy Fedorov et al. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
- Functional diffusion maps (fDMs) evaluated before and after radiochemotherapy predict progression-free and overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
- (2012) B. M. Ellingson et al. NEURO-ONCOLOGY
- Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria
- (2012) J. G. Perez-Larraya et al. NEURO-ONCOLOGY
- Comparison of manual and automatic segmentation methods for brain structures in the presence of space-occupying lesions: a multi-expert study
- (2011) M A Deeley et al. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- Extent of resection influences outcomes for patients with gliomas
- (2011) N. Sanai et al. REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
- A Novel Method for Analyzing DSCE-Images With an Application to Tumor Grading
- (2010) Johannes Slotboom et al. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
- Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group
- (2010) Patrick Y. Wen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas
- (2009) Dieta Brandsma et al. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
- Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial
- (2009) Roger Stupp et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- EXTENT OF RESECTION AND SURVIVAL IN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME
- (2009) et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Multiparametric Tissue Characterization of Brain Neoplasms and Their Recurrence Using Pattern Classification of MR Images
- (2008) Ragini Verma et al. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
- Efficient Multilevel Brain Tumor Segmentation With Integrated Bayesian Model Classification
- (2008) J.J. Corso et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started