Assessment of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infections Using Clinician- and Self-Collected Cervical Sampling Methods in Rural Women from Far Western Nepal
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessment of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infections Using Clinician- and Self-Collected Cervical Sampling Methods in Rural Women from Far Western Nepal
Authors
Keywords
Human papillomavirus, Nepal, Cervical cancer, HPV-16, Human papillomavirus infection, Cytology, Squamous cell carcinomas, Health services research
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages e101255
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2014-07-02
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0101255
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis
- (2014) Marc Arbyn et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population
- (2013) J Cuzick et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- The Natural History of Cervical Human Papillomavirus Infections and Cervical Cancer
- (2013) Cosette Marie Wheeler OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
- High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Messenger RNA Testing in Physician- and Self-Collected Specimens for Cervical Lesion Detection in High-Risk Women, Kenya
- (2013) Jie Ting et al. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
- Risk assessment and clinical impact of liquid-based cytology, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and mRNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening (The FASE Study)
- (2012) Joseph Monsonego et al. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
- High-risk HPV testing on self-sampledversusclinician-collected specimens: A review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening
- (2012) Peter J.F. Snijders et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- The APTIMA HPV assayversusthe hybrid capture 2 test in triage of women with ASC-US or LSIL cervical cytology: A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy
- (2012) Marc Arbyn et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
- High prevalence of oncogenic HPV-16 in cervical smears of asymptomatic women of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: A population-based study
- (2012) Shikha Srivastava et al. JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES
- Pooled Analysis of a Self-Sampling HPV DNA Test as a Cervical Cancer Primary Screening Method
- (2012) F.-H. Zhao et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Knowledge and Acceptability of Pap Smears, Self-Sampling and HPV Vaccination among Adult Women in Kenya
- (2012) Anne F. Rositch et al. PLoS One
- Human Papillomavirus and Cancer Prevention: Gaps in Knowledge and Prospects for Research, Policy, and Advocacy
- (2012) Eduardo L. Franco et al. VACCINE
- Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial
- (2011) Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce et al. LANCET
- Cervical Human Papillomavirus Prevalence in 5 Continents: Meta‐Analysis of 1 Million Women with Normal Cytological Findings
- (2010) Laia Bruni et al. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study
- (2010) Silvia de Sanjose et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Human papillomavirus infection in women with and without cervical cancer in Nepal
- (2009) Ang Tshering Lama Sherpa et al. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
- Age-Specific Prevalence of Infection with Human Papillomavirus in Females: A Global Review
- (2008) Jennifer S. Smith et al. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
- A meta-analysis of human papillomavirus type-distribution in women from South Asia: Implications for vaccination
- (2008) Neerja Bhatla et al. VACCINE
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started