4.6 Article

Crack-Tip Strain Field Mapping and the Toughness of Metallic Glasses

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083289

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0705517, 1107838, 1066293]
  2. hospitality of the Aspen Center for Physics
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH1135]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1107838, 0705517] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have used high-energy x-ray scattering to map the strain fields around crack tips in fracture specimens of a bulk metallic glass under load at room temperature and below. From the measured strain fields we can calculate the components of the stress tensor as a function of position and determine the size and shape of the plastic process zone around the crack tip. Specimens tested at room temperature develop substantial plastic zones and achieve high stress intensities ((K) over bar (If) = 76MPam(1/2)) prior to fracture. Specimens tested at cryogenic temperatures fail at reduced but still substantial stress intensities ((K) over bar (If) = 39MPam(1/2)) and show only limited evidence of crack-tip plasticity. We propose that the difference in behavior is associated with changes in the flow stress and elastic constants, which influence the number density of shear bands in the plastic zone and thus the strain required to initiate fracture on an individual band. A secondary effect is a change in the triaxial state of stress around the crack tip due to the temperature dependence of Poisson's ratio. It is likely that this ability to map elastic strains on the microscale will be useful in other contexts, although interpreting shifts in the position of the scattering peaks in amorphous materials in terms of elastic strains must be done with caution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available