4.1 Article

Combined inhibitory effects of low temperature and N-acetyl-L-cysteine on the postovulatory aging of mouse oocytes

Journal

ZYGOTE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 195-205

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0967199415000039

Keywords

Aging; Antioxidant; Low temperature; N-acetyl-L-cysteine; Oxidative stress

Funding

  1. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Yantai University [SM13B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The postovulatory aging of oocytes eventually affects the development of oocytes and embryos. Oxidative stress is known to accelerate the onset of apoptosis in oocytes and influence their capacity for fertilisation. This study aimed to reveal the roles of temperature and the antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cysteine in preventing the aging of postovulatory mouse oocytes. First, newly ovulated mouse oocytes were cultured at various temperature and time combinations in HCZB medium with varying concentrations of N-acetyl-l-cysteine to assess signs of aging and developmental potential. When cultured in HCZB with 300 M N-acetyl-l-cysteine at different temperature and incubation time combinations (namely 25 degrees C for 12 h, 15 degrees C for 24 h and 5 degrees C for 12 h), the increase in the susceptibility of oocytes to activating stimuli was efficiently prevented, and the developmental potential was maintained following Sr2+ activation or in vitro fertilisation. After incubation at either 15 degrees C for 36 h or 5 degrees C for 24 h, oocytes that had decreased blastocyst rates displayed unrecoverable abnormal cortical granule distribution together with decreased BCL2 levels, total glutathione concentrations and glutathione/glutathione disulphide (GSH/GSSG) ratios. In conclusion, postovulatory oocyte aging could be effectively inhibited by appropriate N-acetyl-L-cysteine addition at low temperatures. In addition, a simple method for the temporary culture of mature oocytes was established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available