Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Mini-Incision versus Standard Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Regarding Surgical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages e80021
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2013-11-14
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0080021
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip
- (2014) R de Verteuil et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- CORR Insights™: Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis
- (2013) Rocco P. Pitto CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis
- (2012) Joseph T. Moskal et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- Comparison of Complications in Single-incision Minimally Invasive THA and Conventional THA
- (2012) Ning Li et al. ORTHOPEDICS
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches and Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Radiological and Complications Outcomes
- (2012) Baohui Yang et al. PLoS One
- Minimally invasive hip surgery: the approach did not make the difference
- (2011) J. R. Varela-Egocheaga et al. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
- Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty
- (2011) Robin Martin et al. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
- Minimally Invasive versus Classic Procedures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2010) Jon H. M. Goosen et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
- Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
- (2010) Toby O. Smith et al. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
- Minimally Invasive Compared with Traditional Transgluteal Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty
- (2010) M. Pospischill et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
- Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial
- (2009) Farhad Mazoochian et al. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY
- Computed tomography for preoperative planning in minimal-invasive total hip arthroplasty: Radiation exposure and cost analysis
- (2009) Alexander Huppertz et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
- A randomised clinical trial comparing minimally invasive surgery to conventional approach for endoprosthesis in elderly patients with hip fractures
- (2009) L. Roy et al. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
- Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review
- (2009) T. Cheng et al. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
- Which is more invasive—mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?
- (2009) T. Shitama et al. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
- Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
- (2009) C. Yang et al. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
- Analysis of Published Evidence on Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty
- (2008) Simon J. Wall et al. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started