4.6 Article

Validation and Calibration of a Computer Simulation Model of Pediatric HIV Infection

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083389

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT)
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K01 AI078754, K24 AI062476, R01 AI058736, R01 AI093269, U01 AI069911, U01AI09919]
  3. Harvard Center for AIDS Research
  4. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
  5. March of Dimes Foundation
  6. Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research
  7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [U01 AI068632]
  8. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  9. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [AI068632]
  10. Statistical and Data Analysis Center at Harvard School of Public Health, under the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [5 U01 AI41110, 1 U01 AI068616]
  11. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  12. NICHD International and Domestic Pediatric and Maternal HIV Clinical Trials Network
  13. NICHD [N01-DK-9-001/HHSN267200800001C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Computer simulation models can project long-term patient outcomes and inform health policy. We internally validated and then calibrated a model of HIV disease in children before initiation of antiretroviral therapy to provide a framework against which to compare the impact of pediatric HIV treatment strategies. Methods: We developed a patient-level (Monte Carlo) model of HIV progression among untreated children <5 years of age, using the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications model framework: the CEPAC-Pediatric model. We populated the model with data on opportunistic infection and mortality risks from the International Epidemiologic Database to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA), with mean CD4% at birth (42%) and mean CD4% decline (1.4%/month) from the Women and Infants' Transmission Study (WITS). We internally validated the model by varying WITS-derived CD4% data, comparing the corresponding model-generated survival curves to empirical survival curves from IeDEA, and identifying best-fitting parameter sets as those with a root-mean square error (RMSE) <0.01. We then calibrated the model to other African settings by systematically varying immunologic and HIV mortality-related input parameters. Model-generated survival curves for children aged 0-60 months were compared, again using RMSE, to UNAIDS data from >1,300 untreated, HIV-infected African children. Results: In internal validation analyses, model-generated survival curves fit IeDEA data well; modeled and observed survival at 16 months of age were 91.2% and 91.1%, respectively. RMSE varied widely with variations in CD4% parameters; the best fitting parameter set (RMSE = 0.00423) resulted when CD4% was 45% at birth and declined by 6%/month (ages 0-3 months) and 0.3%/month (ages > 3 months). In calibration analyses, increases in IeDEA-derived mortality risks were necessary to fit UNAIDS survival data. Conclusions: The CEPAC-Pediatric model performed well in internal validation analyses. Increases in modeled mortality risks required to match UNAIDS data highlight the importance of pre-enrollment mortality in many pediatric cohort studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available