Improving Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Self-Guided Internet Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Randomised Controlled Trial
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Improving Adherence and Clinical Outcomes in Self-Guided Internet Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Randomised Controlled Trial
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages e62873
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2013-07-04
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0062873
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Efficacy, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of self-help interventions for anxiety disorders: systematic review
- (2012) Catrin Lewis et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Email-based promotion of self-help for subthreshold depression: Mood Memos randomised controlled trial
- (2012) Amy J. Morgan et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Anxiety Online—A Virtual Clinic: Preliminary Outcomes Following Completion of Five Fully Automated Treatment Programs for Anxiety Disorders and Symptoms
- (2011) Britt Klein et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A RCT of a Transdiagnostic Internet-Delivered Treatment for Three Anxiety Disorders: Examination of Support Roles and Disorder-Specific Outcomes
- (2011) Luke Johnston et al. PLoS One
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Internet Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Social Phobia with and Without Motivational Enhancement Strategies
- (2010) Nickolai Titov et al. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Internet-delivered psychotherapy for depression in adults
- (2010) Nickolai Titov CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY
- The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review
- (2010) Kurt Kroenke et al. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
- Internet Treatment for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician Assistance
- (2010) Nickolai Titov et al. PLoS One
- Internet Treatment for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinician vs. Technician Assistance
- (2010) Emma Robinson et al. PLoS One
- Characteristics of Adults with Anxiety or Depression Treated at an Internet Clinic: Comparison with a National Survey and an Outpatient Clinic
- (2010) Nickolai Titov et al. PLoS One
- Computer Therapy for the Anxiety and Depressive Disorders Is Effective, Acceptable and Practical Health Care: A Meta-Analysis
- (2010) Gavin Andrews et al. PLoS One
- Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies
- (2010) P. Cuijpers et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- Shyness 3: Randomized Controlled Trial of Guided Versus Unguided Internet-Based CBT for Social Phobia
- (2009) Nickolai Titov et al. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- An RCT Comparing Effect of Two Types of Support on Severity of Symptoms for People Completing Internet-Based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Social Phobia
- (2009) Nickolai Titov et al. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder: randomised controlled trial
- (2009) Tomas Furmark et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression
- (2009) Helen Christensen et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Effectiveness of a Novel Integrative Online Treatment for Depression (Deprexis): Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2009) Björn Meyer et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population
- (2009) Bernd Löwe et al. MEDICAL CARE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started