4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Denervated Laryngeal Muscle in a Large Animal Model

Journal

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 876-885

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/aor.12624

Keywords

Equine; Larynx; Reanimation; Neuroprosthesis; Functional electrical stimulation

Funding

  1. Med-El Elektromedizinische Gerate GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
  2. Zweig Memorial Fund for Equine Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bilateral vocal fold paralysis (BVCP) is a life-threatening condition that follows injury to the Recurrent Laryngeal nerve (RLn) and denervation of the intrinsic laryngeal musculature. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) enables restoration and control of a wide variety of motor functions impaired by lower motor neuron lesions. Here we evaluate the effects of FES on the sole arytenoid abductor, the posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscle in a large animal model of RLn injury. Ten horses were instrumented with two quadripolar intramuscular electrodes in the left PCA muscle. Following a 12-week denervation period, the PCA was stimulated using a once-daily training session for 8 weeks in seven animals. Three animals were used as unstimulated controls. Denervation produced a significant increase in rheobase (P<0.001). Electrical stimulation produced a 30% increase in fiber diameter in comparison with the unstimulated control group (33.9 +/- 2.6 mu m FES+, 23.6 +/- 4.2 mu m FES-, P=0.04). A trend toward a decrease in the proportion of type 1 (slow) fibers and an increase in type 2a (fast) fibers was also observed. Despite these changes, improvement in PCA function at rest was not observed. These data suggest that electrical stimulation using a relatively conservative set of stimulation parameters can reverse the muscle fiber atrophy produced by complete denervation while avoiding a shift to a slow (type 1) fiber type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available