Angiogenesis Inhibitor Bevacizumab Increases the Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Associated with Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Angiogenesis Inhibitor Bevacizumab Increases the Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Associated with Chemotherapy: A Meta-Analysis
Authors
Keywords
Coronary heart disease, Ischemia, Cancer treatment, Colorectal cancer, Meta-analysis, Renal cell carcinoma, Randomized controlled trials, Cancer chemotherapy
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages e66721
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2013-06-21
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0066721
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, with emphasis on chemotherapy subgroups
- (2012) Ligia Traldi Macedo et al. BMC CANCER
- Effectiveness of Bevacizumab With First-Line Combination Chemotherapy for Medicare Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
- (2012) Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Effect of Angiogenesis Inhibitor Bevacizumab on Survival in Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature
- (2012) Yuan Su et al. PLoS One
- Survival-adjusted health-related quality of life (HRQL) among patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone: results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study 2100 (E2100)
- (2011) David Cella et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- Cardiac side effects of molecular targeted therapies: Towards a better dialogue between oncologists and cardiologists
- (2011) Stephane Ederhy et al. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
- Efficacy of bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of standard first-line chemotherapy (BeTa): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- (2011) Roy S Herbst et al. LANCET
- Treating Primary Liver Cancer with Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Floxuridine and Dexamethasone: Does the Addition of Systemic Bevacizumab Improve Results?
- (2011) Nancy E. Kemeny et al. ONCOLOGY
- Cardiovascular toxicity of anti-angiogenic drugs
- (2011) Gaetan des Guetz et al. Targeted Oncology
- Risk of cardiac ischemia and arterial thromboembolic events with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- (2010) Vishal Ranpura et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- A randomized two arm phase III study in patients post radical resection of liver metastases of colorectal cancer to investigate bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) vs CAPOX alone as adjuvant treatment
- (2010) Nikol Snoeren et al. BMC CANCER
- Cardiovascular effects of systemic cancer treatment
- (2010) Elżbieta Senkus et al. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
- Phase III Trial of Bevacizumab Plus Interferon Alfa Versus Interferon Alfa Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Results of CALGB 90206
- (2010) Brian I. Rini et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Initial Safety Report of NSABP C-08: A Randomized Phase III Study of Modified FOLFOX6 With or Without Bevacizumab for the Adjuvant Treatment of Patients With Stage II or III Colon Cancer
- (2009) Carmen J. Allegra et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy
- (2009) Edward T.H. Yeh et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Capecitabine and irinotecan with and without bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer patients
- (2009) Markus Moehler et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started