Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages e62395
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2013-04-25
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0062395
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals
- (2013) Matthew E. Falagas et al. PLoS One
- Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator
- (2013) Ludo Waltman et al. Journal of Informetrics
- A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science
- (2012) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Citation rates in mathematics: a study of variation by subdiscipline
- (2012) Lawrence Smolinsky et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Comparison of number of citations to full original articles versus brief reports
- (2012) Michael N. Mavros et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The inconsistency of the h-index
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- How has healthcare research performance been assessed? A systematic review
- (2011) Vanash M Patel et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research
- (2011) Tobias Opthof MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING
- A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking
- (2011) Wolfgang Glänzel et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS
- (2010) Nees Jan van Eck et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Journal Editorials give indication of driving science issues
- (2010) Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer et al. NATURE
- Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership
- (2010) Richard Klavans et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- On the map: Nature and Science editorials
- (2010) Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals
- (2010) Henk F. Moed Journal of Informetrics
- Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations
- (2010) Ludo Waltman et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
- (2009) Nees Jan van Eck et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor
- (2008) Michel Zitt et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
- (2008) F. Radicchi et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts
- (2008) Christoph Neuhaus et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now