4.6 Article

Skin Perfusion and Oxygenation Changes in Radiation Fibrosis

Journal

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages 707-716

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818b94

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 DK32520]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Ionizing radiation is known to have deleterious chronic effects on skin, including fibrosis and poor wound healing, hypothesized as mediated by ischemia and hypoxia. Past studies have been unable to simultaneously investigate changes in perfusion and oxygenation as separate parameters. Hyperspectral imaging has emerged as a tool with which to concurrently measure skin perfusion and oxygenation. The authors investigated the use of hyperspectral imaging in a novel murine model of chronic radiation injury. Methods: Areas of flank skin (n = 20) on hairless mice were exposed to a 50-Gy dose of beta-radiation. Hyperspectral imaging acquisition was performed at select points through 8 weeks. Immunohistochemical staining and gene expression analysis were performed to evaluate cutaneous vascular density, epidermal cell hypoxia, and angiogenic factors. Results: All irradiated areas developed a chronic-phase wound by day 28. Hyperspectral imaging demonstrated a 21 percent decline in perfusion on day 56 (p < 0.001), whereas oxygenation levels were unchanged. A 1.7-fold reduction in blood vessel density was measured in irradiated skin compared with control tissue (p < 0.001), but no difference in epidermal cell hypoxia was observed. Vascular endothelial growth factor and related receptor expression were significantly lower in irradiated tissue. Conclusions: The authors' analysis does not support the presence of hypoxia in chronic-phase irradiated skin but suggests that hypoperfusion may be a predominant characteristic. The concurrent states of hypoperfusion and normoxia may be explained by the lower metabolic demands of fibrosed tissue. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 131: 707, 2013.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available