Reducing Healthcare Costs Facilitated by Surgical Auditing: A Systematic Review
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reducing Healthcare Costs Facilitated by Surgical Auditing: A Systematic Review
Authors
Keywords
Cost Reduction, Cost Evaluation, Quality Improvement Program, Quality Improvement Initiative, Vascular Procedure
Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 1672-1680
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-02-18
DOI
10.1007/s00268-015-3005-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Association Between Occurrence of a Postoperative Complication and Readmission
- (2013) Elise H. Lawson et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- The Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit
- (2013) N.J. Van Leersum et al. EJSO
- Breast cancer surgery and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): Patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries
- (2012) David Scheller-Kreinsen et al. BREAST
- Impact of obesity on the cost of major colorectal surgery
- (2012) R. Tapper et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Improved guideline compliance after a 3-year audit of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer care in the western part of the Netherlands
- (2012) Lydia G.M. van der Geest et al. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to Improve Surgical Outcomes
- (2012) Oscar D. Guillamondegui et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Cost-Effectiveness of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
- (2011) Christopher S. Hollenbeak et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- The Impact of Complications on Costs of Major Surgical Procedures
- (2011) René Vonlanthen et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Surgical Site Infections and Cost in Obese Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery
- (2011) Elizabeth C. Wick ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
- Use Of 13 Disease Registries In 5 Countries Demonstrates The Potential To Use Outcome Data To Improve Health Care’s Value
- (2011) Stefan Larsson et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Appendectomy and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries
- (2011) Wilm Quentin et al. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
- Complications of intestinal stomas
- (2010) P. Nastro et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- What Is Value in Health Care?
- (2010) Michael E. Porter NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Preliminary NSQIP results: A tool for quality improvement
- (2010) Robert J. Stachler et al. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
- A statewide consortium of surgical care: A longitudinal investigation of vascular operative procedures at 16 hospitals
- (2010) Peter K. Henke et al. SURGERY
- The cost effectiveness of elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for symptomatic diverticular disease: financial outcome of the randomized control Sigma trial
- (2010) Bastiaan R. Klarenbeek et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Potential hospital cost-savings attributed to improvements in outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery following self-audit
- (2010) Louisa G Gordon et al. BMC Surgery
- The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: learning from the past and moving to the future
- (2009) Karl Hammermeister AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Registries for Robust Evidence
- (2009) Nancy A. Dreyer JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Nationwide outcome registrations to improve quality of care in rectal surgery. An initiative of the European society of surgical oncology
- (2008) Willem van Gijn et al. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Prioritizing Quality Improvement in General Surgery
- (2008) Peter L. Schilling et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started