4.1 Article

Genetic diversity among the six varieties of Acacia caven (Leguminosae, Mimosoideae) evaluated at the molecular and phenotypic levels

Journal

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 284, Issue 3-4, Pages 187-199

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-009-0244-y

Keywords

Acacia caven; Varieties; RAPD; Morphological traits; Genetic diversity; Discriminant analysis

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnica [PICT 32064]
  2. University of Buenos Aires [X321]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [PIP 5122]
  4. Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The existence of six varieties of Acacia caven has been established on the basis of differences in fruit morphology. Taking into account the controversial evidence provided by morphology, molecular markers might be a useful tool for evaluation of genetic differentiation among varieties of A. caven. Given this fact, we conducted a parallel analysis of genetic and phenotypic diversity among and within six varieties of A. caven with the objective of determining whether the varieties described on morphological grounds represent genetically differentiated entities. Distinction of the six varieties was examined using morphological and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. RAPD data were analyzed with basic descriptive genetic statistics, by hierarchical genetic analysis, and by discriminant analysis. Morphological data were studied by means of univariate, multivariate, and discriminant analysis. The results from analysis of variance components for morphological data are in concordance with those from molecular markers, because most of the variance is found within populations. The results, obtained here from molecular markers, support the taxonomic differentiation of the six varieties studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available