4.5 Article

Long-term effects of returning wheat straw to croplands on soil compaction and nutrient availability under conventional tillage

Journal

PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 280-286

Publisher

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/846/2012-PSE

Keywords

soil organic matter; soil bulk density; soil nitrogen; soil phosphorus; soil water content

Categories

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China [201203030-07-01]
  2. AnHui Province technical program [1206c0805033]
  3. Anhui Academic of Agricultural Science [11B1021, 13B1043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the effects of returning wheat straw to croplands on soil compaction and nutrient availability, this trial was designed: (1) planted crops without fertilization (NF); (2) natural land without human activities (CT); (3) applied mineral fertilizers in combination with 7500 kg/ha wheat straw (WS-NPK); (4) applied mineral fertilizers in combination with 3750 kg/ha wheat straw (1/2WS-NPK); and (5) applied mineral fertilizers alone (NPK). It is found that, compared with NPK, the soil bulk density in 1/2WS-NPK and WS-NPK both decreased by more than 10% in the 0 cm to 15 cm layer, and by 6.93% and 9.14% in the 15 cm to 20 cm, respectively. Furthermore, in contrast to NPK, the soil available nitrogen in the 0 cm to 25 cm layer in 1/2WS-NPK and WS-NPK were higher by 17.43% and 35.19%, and the soil available potassium were higher by 7.66% and 17.47%, respectively. For soil available phosphorus in the depth of 5 cm to 25 cm, it was higher by 18.51% in 1/2WS-NPK and by 56.97% in WS-NPK, respectively. Therefore, returning wheat straw to croplands effectively improves soil compaction and nutrients availability, and the improvement in soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability is closely related to the amount of wheat straw.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available