4.6 Article

Prognostic factors and survival in patients with gastric stump cancer

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1865-1871

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1865

Keywords

Gastric stump cancer; Clinicopathological characteristics; Prognosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272726]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education, China [20110071120097]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau Research Project [20114174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM: To elucidate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of gastric stump cancer (GSC). METHODS: The clinical data for 92 patients with GSC were collected at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The prognostic factors were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: GSC tended to occur within 25 years following the primary surgery, when the initial disease is benign, whereas it primarily occurred within the first 15 years post-operation for gastric cancer. Patients with regular follow-up after primary surgery had a better survival rate. The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Borrmann type I/II (HR = 3.165, 95% CI: 1.055-9.500, P = 0.040) and radical resection (HR = 1.780, 95% CI: 1.061-2.987, P = 0.029) were independent prognostic factors for GSC. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of the 92 patients were 78.3%, 45.6% and 27.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of those undergoing radical resection were 79.3%, 52.2%, and 37.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for stages I, II, III, and IV were 85.7%, 47.4%, 16.0%, and 13.3%, respectively (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The appearance of GSC occurs sooner in patients with primary malignant cancer than in patients with a primary benign disease. Therefore, close follow-up is necessary. The overall survival of patients with GSC is poor, and curative resection can improve their prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available