4.3 Article

Clonal ability, height and growth form explain species' response to habitat deterioration in Fennoscandian wooded meadows

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 215, Issue 9, Pages 953-962

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-014-0347-6

Keywords

Wooded meadows; Mowing; Habitat deterioration; Functional traits; Response groups

Funding

  1. Estonian Science Foundation [7567, 8745]
  2. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [IUT21-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fennoscandian calcareous wooded meadows have high conservation value due to very high diversity which has been maintained by consistent mowing, but undergo species loss when this management is abandoned. We compared species richness and composition of regularly mown and abandoned wooded meadows in Estonia and established species groups with respect to their response to abandonment. These meadows were very species rich with a maximum of 43 species per 0.25 m(2). Species whose populations are maintained by mowing constituted > 60 % of the floristic diversity of the mown wooded meadows. Abandonment suppressed species with a preference for dry infertile open habitats. Response to abandonment was related to clonality, height and growth form. The greatest negative response was associated with low graminoids, short-lived and non-clonal species, rosette and semi-rosette growth form. Weak competitors with low height and light seeds exhibited a slow decline; perennial life span and clonality enable a delay in local extinction of these species. Response groups had similar persistence at a national level, revealing that earlier assessment of species dynamics at larger spatial scales could underestimate the number of threatened species. Application of restoration measures could avoid local extinctions of many mowing-supported species, whereas some of the mowing-dependent species likely need reintroduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available