4.5 Article

Colchicine-induced polyploidy in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.)

Journal

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages 453-461

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-014-0612-3

Keywords

Tetraploidy; Triploidy; Ploidy level; Flow cytometry; Stomatal characteristics

Funding

  1. National Agency 'Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias' (INIA) [RF 2010-0003-00-00]
  2. INIA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The induction of polyploids in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.) is of great interest for producing larger and seedless fruits according to market demands. Under this premise, this work was aimed to obtain tetraploid plants of loquat using the antimitotic agent colchicine. Experiments consisted in applying colchicine on shoot apex from in vitro-grown plants, in vitro-grown whole plants and ungerminated seeds. Treatments on the shoot apex or submerging whole plants produced no stable polyploids. Conversely, subjecting ungerminated seeds to colchicine produced two triploids in the 0.5 % (w/v) solution after 24 h and one tetraploid after 48 h. The triploids obtained among treated seeds make us believe that these plants were present in the hybrids original seedlot. Polyploidy levels were firstly detected by flow cytometry and later confirmed by chromosome counting and morphological characteristics. The relative fluorescence was 1.5-fold higher in triploids and twofold higher in tetraploids as compared to diploids. As expected, the chromosome number was 2n = 34 in diploids, 2n = 51 in triploids and 2n = 68 in the tetraploid. Moreover, differences in morphological characteristics between diploid and polyploid plants were significant. The tetraploid plant was more compact than triploids or diploids. Particularly, stomata of polyploids were larger with lower density than diploids. Results indicate that induction of polyploidy in loquat species is a reliable tool for breeding new loquat varieties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available