4.5 Article

In vitro propagation of the endangered orchid Laelia speciosa

Journal

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 335-343

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-009-9609-8

Keywords

Endangered orchid; In vitro culture; Laelia speciosa; Seed germination

Funding

  1. Fondo Mexicano para la Conservacion de la Naturaleza (FMCN) [1-99/130]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (SEMARNAT-CONACYT) [2002-C01-0544, 130249]
  3. Coordinacion de la Investigacion Cientifica
  4. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo
  5. DGEP-UNAM [202392]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laelia speciosa is an endangered epiphytic orchid. The effects of various media components on germination of L. speciosa were evaluated. Pods were collected at 4, 7, and 9 months following hand-pollination, and seeds were germinated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) media with 30 g l(-1) sucrose and five concentrations (0.0, 0.04, 0.22, 0.44, and 2.22 mu M) of benzyladenine (BA) under light and dark conditions. Gibberellic acid (GA(3); 0.0, 0.29, 1.44, 2.89, 14. 43 and 28.87 mu M) with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA; 0.0, 0.54, 1.34, 2.69, and 5.37 mu M) were evaluated for in vitro subcultivation. MS medium with 30 g l(-1) sucrose was effective for germination. The effects of BA and light on germination of L. speciosa seeds differed with pod maturity. All mature seeds germinated using 0.44 mu M BA and light. The highest frequency of germinated seedlings (60%) was obtained using mature seeds grown on MS medium without BA and under light conditions. For subculture, MS with 30 g l(-1) sucrose, 2.69 mu M NAA, and 0.29 mu M GA(3) was effective. Plantlets of 5 cm in length were transplanted to the greenhouse, and a 77.5% of survival rate was obtained. A successful protocol for micropropagation by seed germination will contribute to the development of a sustainable management program for L. speciosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available