4.7 Article

Carbon isotope discrimination during branch photosynthesis of Fagus sylvatica: a Bayesian modelling approach

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 1516-1535

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12262

Keywords

Farquhar model; gas exchange; isotopologues; laser spectrometer; open branch bags; photosynthetic C-13 discrimination

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission [MEXT-CT-2006-042268]
  2. SIBAE STSM [COST-STSM-ECOST-STSM-ES0806-280211-005035]
  3. INRA department EFPA in Cambridge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field measurements of photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination ((13)Delta) of Fagus sylvatica, conducted with branch bags and laser spectrometry, revealed a high variability of (13)Delta, both on diurnal and day-to-day timescales. We tested the prediction capability of three versions of a commonly used model for (13)Delta [called here comprehensive ((13)Delta(comp)), simplified ((13)Delta(simple)) and revised ((13)Delta(revised)) versions]. A Bayesian approach was used to calibrate major model parameters. Constrained estimates were found for the fractionation during CO2 fixation in (13)Delta(comp), but not in (13)Delta(simple), and partially for the mesophyll conductance for CO2 (g(i)). No constrained estimates were found for fractionations during mitochondrial and photorespiration, and for a diurnally variable apparent fractionation between current assimilates and mitochondrial respiration, specific to (13)Delta(revised). A quantification of parameter estimation uncertainties and interdependencies further helped explore model structure and behaviour. We found that (13)Delta(comp) usually outperformed (13)Delta(simple) because of the explicit consideration of g(i) and the photorespiratory fractionation in (13)Delta(comp) that enabled a better description of the large observed diurnal variation (approximate to 9 parts per thousand) of (13)Delta. Flux-weighted daily means of (13)Delta were also better predicted with (13)Delta(comp) than with (13)Delta(simple).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available