4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance during germination

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 211-222

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02071.x

Keywords

2-D gel electrophoresis; barley grain; mapping population; proteome analysis; QTL analysis; salt tolerance

Categories

Funding

  1. BMBF [FKZ 0313115]
  2. COST short-term scientific mission fellowship [FA0603-03178]
  3. DFG [Mo 479/4-1, 4-2]
  4. DAAD/Leibniz [A/03/27383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present paper, we based a search for candidates underlying different levels of salinity tolerance during germination in the Oregon Wolfe Barley mapping population (DOM x REC) by proteomic profiling of the mature grain of lines showing differing levels of salinity tolerance. By contrasting the parents DOM and REC, displaying divergent stress responses, and two tolerant and two sensitive segregants, six protein spots were identified that showed a differential abundance between the tolerant and the sensitive lines. The tolerant lines expressed a higher level of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and glucose/ribitol dehydrogenase (Glc/RibDH). Both proteins were heterologously over-expressed in an osmo-sensitive yeast strain and over-expression of Glc/RibDH resulted in an enhanced ability of yeast transformants to grow on salt containing media. A quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of the population germinating at different salt concentrations led to the identification of two chromosome regions on 5H and one on 7H associated with salt stress response. A dense barley transcript map was employed to map the genomic region of all identified proteins. Two of these, heat-shock protein 70 and Glc/RibDH, co-localized with the identified QTL on chromosome 5H. The putative functional role of the candidates is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available