4.7 Article

Cadmium uptake kinetics and plants factors of shoot Cd concentration

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 367, Issue 1-2, Pages 591-603

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1498-7

Keywords

Net Cd influx; Shoot Cd concentration; Cd translocation; Root surface area; Root absorbing power; Nutrient solution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accumulation of Cd in the shoots of plants grown on Cd contaminated soils shows considerable variation. A previous preliminary experiment established that one major reason for this variation was the rate of Cd influx into the roots (mol Cd cm(-2) root s(-1)). However, this experiment did not distinguish between solubilization of soil Cd on the one hand and difference in Cd uptake kinetics on the other. The main objectives of the present study were thus to characterize Cd uptake kinetics of plants continuously exposed to Cd concentrations similar to those encountered in soils. Furthermore we determined the factors responsible for differences in shoot Cd concentration such as net Cd influx, root area-shoot dry weight ratio, shoot growth rate and proportion of Cd translocated to the shoot. Maize, sunflower, flax and spinach were grown in nutrient solution with five constant Cd concentrations varying from 0 to 1.0 mu mol L-1. Root and shoot parameters as well as Cd uptake were determined at two harvest dates and from these data Cd net influx and shoot growth rates were calculated. Cadmium uptake kinetics, i.e. the net Cd influx vs. Cd solution concentration followed a straight line. Its slope is the root absorbing power, alpha, . The alpha values of spinach and flax were about double that of maize and sunflower (5 x 10(-6) cm s(-1) vs. 2.5 x 10(-6) cm s(-1)). Spinach and flax had a 3-5 times higher shoot Cd concentration than maize and sunflower. The difference in shoot Cd concentration was partly due to the higher Cd influx but also to a higher translocation of Cd from root to shoot and also to a slower shoot growth rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available