4.7 Article

Using hydrogel and clay to improve the water status of seedlings for dryland restoration

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 344, Issue 1-2, Pages 99-110

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0730-1

Keywords

Quercus suber; Plant stock quality; Substrate; Water availability; Carbon isotope composition

Funding

  1. European Commission [QLRT-2001-01594]
  2. Spanish Government through the Ministry of Environment (ESTRES) [063/SGTB/2007/7.1]
  3. Consolider program INGENIO 2010 (GRACCIE Project) [CSD2007-00067]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana (APLITEC) [GV 05/208]
  5. INNOVA [GVPRE/2008/085, Feedbacks-Prometeo/2009/006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In dryland ecosystems, post-transplant water stress produces high seedling mortality after the first summer following outplanting. Our aim was to assess the effects of clay and hydrogel, both on the water holding capacity of the growing media and on various morphological and physiological characteristics of Quercus suber seedlings in the nursery and, subsequently, during the first 2 years in the field. Quercus suber L. seedlings were grown in four types of growing media: CS (Control growing media, standard mixture of limed peat and coconut peat, 1:1 v/v ratio), SC-10 (CS mixed with sepiolite clay at 10% v/v) and HS (CS mixed with hydrogel StockosorbA (R) K-400 at two doses, 0.7 and 1.5% w/w). HS-1.5 showed the best results, increasing the water holding capacity of the root plug, improving seedling water status and increasing seedling survival in the field. SC-10 showed an intermediate effect on seedling response in the field. Mixing hydrogel with a peat-based growing medium to form root plugs is a suitable technique for cultivating species to be planted in areas with a strong water deficit. This technique reduces post-transplant water stress in seedlings during their first months in the field and contributes to improve forest-restoration methods in dryland ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available