4.3 Article

Mars impact ejecta in the regolith of Phobos: Bulk concentration and distribution

Journal

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 115-129

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2013.09.005

Keywords

Mars ejects; Phobos ejects; Phobos regolith; Phobos meteorites

Funding

  1. NASA through NASA/ESA Mars Express High-Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) team membership, JPL [1237163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gravity of Mars and the observation of a thick Phobos regolith suggest that nearly all Phobos ejecta returns to Phobos and re-impacts on Phobos. Primary ejecta from Mars typically impacts Phobos at velocities of similar to 2-3 km/s and due to the low escape velocity from Phobos of similar to 4-10 m/s, similar to 95-99% of the secondary ejects from Phobos is inserted into temporary orbits around Mars. Most Phobos ejecta fragments remain trapped in orbits around Mars for several days to several hundred years until they re-impact with Phobos and produce new generations of ejecta. Mars-orbiting Phobos ejecta fragments typically re-impact on opposite hemispheres of Phobos from their previous impact sites, and when combined with the typical conical dispersion pattern of impact ejecta, this suggests that just two or three generations of re-impacts on Phobos are sufficient to uniformly disperse Mars ejecta fragments globally across the geographic surface of Phobos. Due to the energy conversion inefficiencies of impact processes, subsequent re-impacts produce subsequent generations of ejecta with lower launch velocities, and a higher proportion of Phobos ejecta remains on Phobos. Once no new ejects fragments are launched from Phobos at velocities that are greater than the local escape velocity from Phobos, no new Mars-orbiting ejecta are produced. While in orbit around Mars, particles of ejecta are perturbed by martian gravity and solar photon forces that combine to produce an increase in the orbital eccentricities, which preferentially alters the orbits of the smallest fragments. Dust fragments less than or similar to 300 mu m are typically de-orbited to the atmosphere of Mars or to solar orbits within several years, whereas fragments greater than or similar to 300 mm tend to remain in orbit until they re-impact with Phobos. The rapid removal of dust fragments less than or similar to 300 mu m places a severe limit on their opportunities for a re-impact with Phobos and suggests a deficiency of dust grains less than or similar to 300 mu m in the regolith of Phobos. For the present-day altitude of Phobos, we calculate that the flux from solar system projectiles that impacts Phobos is similar to 200 x greater than the flux from primary Mars ejecta. Based on lunar regolith observations, the bulk concentration of solar system projectiles in the regolith of Phobos is likely to be similar to 3%, which, when adjusted for solar system flux in the vicinity of Mars, suggests a bulk concentration of Mars ejects fragments in the regolith of Phobos of similar to 250 ppm. Phobos has orbited at least 4000 km farther from Mars during all but the most recent similar to 500 Myr, and throughout the majority of the early geological history of Phobos, ejecta plumes from Mars would have expanded to a much larger volumes and would have diffused to substantially lower volumetric densities at the point of intersection with Phobos. This suggests that our prediction of similar to 250 ppm for the bulk concentration of Mars ejecta in the present day may only be found preferentially closer to the younger upper regolith of Phobos, and at depth, Mars ejecta fragments are likely to be found in bulk concentrations that are 10-60 x less than at the surface of Phobos. We also calculate that ejecta fragments from the regolith of Phobos (Phobos meteorites) may be found on Mars in abundances comparable to lunar meteorites on Earth. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available