4.2 Article

Effective performance of contrast enhanced SPACE imaging in clearly depicting the margin of pituitary adenoma

Journal

PITUITARY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 480-486

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-014-0599-0

Keywords

Pituitary adenoma; Cavernous sinus invasion; Magnetic resonance imaging; SPACE sequence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to determine if contrast enhanced (CE) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip-angle evolutions (SPACE) images can provide clearer pituitary adenoma margin than conventional CE T1-weighted spin echo (T1-SE) sequence for cavernous sinus (CS) invasion evaluation. 21 healthy volunteers were preformed with SPACE scans before and after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine at different time points (1, 7 and 13 min). Signal intensity (SI) of regions of interest was plotted in SI/time curves for bilateral CS, pituitary and temporal lobe. 35 patients with pituitary adenoma (a parts per thousand yen1 cm) were performed CE T1-SE and CE SPACE scans. Two observers made the visual assessment of the tumor margin delineation and CS invasion evaluation on both SPACE and T1-SE images. Surgical findings were compared with the invasion assessment results. At 1, 7 and 13 min after enhancement, SI of left CS increased 6.7, 9.5 and 11.2 % respectively compared with unenhanced images (all p < 0.05). Right CS increased 7.2, 9.3 and 11.3 % (all p < 0.05 %). Within pituitary, a decline (6.3 %, p < 0.05) of SI was measured at 1 min after enhancement. CE SPACE performed superior to those of CE T1-SE sequence in visual assessment of tumor edge (assessment score, 1.66 +/- A 0.42 vs. 1.23 +/- A 0.65, p < 0.05), as well as the specificity (86.8 vs. 66.0 %, p < 0.05) and accuracy(85.7 vs. 68.6 %, p < 0.05) for CS invasion evaluation. CE SPACE could provide better contrast of pituitary adenoma with surrounding CS and clear demonstration of tumor edge for CS invasion evaluation than conventional CE T1-SE sequence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available