4.5 Article

Long-Term Induction of Defense Gene Expression in Potato by Pseudomonas sp LBUM223 and Streptomyces scabies

Journal

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages 926-932

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-13-0321-R

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  2. New Brunswick Innovation Foundation
  3. Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Streptomyces scabies is a causal agent of common scab of potato, which generates necrotic tuber lesions. We have previously demonstrated that inoculation of potato plants with phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA)-producing Pseudomonas sp. LBUM223 could significantly reduce common scab symptoms. In the present study, we investigated whether LBUM223 or an isogenic phzC- mutant not producing PCA could elicit an induced systemic resistance response in potato. The expression of eight defense-related genes (salicylic acid [SA]-related ChtA, PR-lb, PR-2, and PR-5; and jasnionic acid and ethylene-related LOX, PIN2, PAL-2, and ERF3) was quantified using newly developed TaqMan reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays in 5- and 10-week-old potted potato plants. Although only wild-type LBUM223 was capable of significantly reducing common scab symptoms, the presence of both LBUM223 and its PCA-deficient mutant were equally able to upregulate the expression of LOX and PR-5. The presence of S. scabies overexpressed all SA-related genes. This indicates that (i) upregulation of potato defense-related genes by LBUM223 is unlikely to contribute to common scab's control and (ii) LBUM223's capacity to produce PCA is not involved in this upregulation. These results suggest that a direct interaction occurring between S. scabies and PCA-producing LBUM223 is more likely involved in controlling common scab development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available