The Quality of Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Varies between Subdisciplines of Physiotherapy

Language of publication has a small influence on the quality of reports of controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions

(2012) Sílvia Regina Shiwa et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study

(2011) Natalie A. de Morton   AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY

Blind outcome assessment: the development and use of procedures to maintain and describe blinding in a pragmatic physiotherapy rehabilitation trial

(2010) CJ Minns Lowe et al.   CLINICAL REHABILITATION

There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials

(2010) Luciana Gazzi Macedo et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Reported quality of randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions has improved over time

(2010) Anne M. Moseley et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions

(2010) Zoe A. Michaleff et al.   PHYSICAL THERAPY

Ten years of evidence to guide physiotherapy interventions: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)

(2009) C. Sherrington et al.   BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE

Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, Hooked on Evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed

(2009) Anne M. Moseley et al.   Physiotherapy

A Description of the Trials, Reviews, and Practice Guidelines Indexed in the PEDro Database

(2008) Christopher G Maher et al.   PHYSICAL THERAPY