4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Anisotropic conductivity tensor imaging using magnetic induction tomography

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages S135-S145

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/31/8/S11

Keywords

magnetic induction tomography; image reconstruction; tensor imaging; anisotropic inversion

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [F 3207] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic induction tomography aims to reconstruct the electrical conductivity distribution of the human body using non-contact measurements. The potential of the method has been demonstrated by various simulation studies and a number of phantom experiments. These studies have all relied on models having isotropic distributions of conductivity, although the human body has a highly heterogeneous structure with partially anisotropic properties. Therefore, whether the conventional modeling approaches used so far are appropriate for clinical applications or not is still an open question. To investigate the problem, we performed a simulation study to investigate the feasibility of (1) imaging anisotropic perturbations within an isotropic medium and (2) imaging isotropic perturbations inside a partially anisotropic background. The first is the case for the imaging of anomalies that have anisotropic characteristics and the latter is the case e. g. in lung imaging where an anisotropic skeletal muscle tissue surrounds the lungs and the rib cage. An anisotropic solver based on the singular value decomposition was used to attain conductivity tensor images to be compared with the ones obtained from isotropic solvers. The results indicate the importance of anisotropic modeling in order to obtain satisfactory reconstructions, especially for the imaging of the anisotropic anomalies, and address the resolvability of the conductivity tensor components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available