4.5 Article

Are elite endurance athletes genetically predisposed to lower disease risk?

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 82-90

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00183.2009

Keywords

mortality; physical activity; exercise; cardiorespiratory fitness

Funding

  1. Progenika Biopharma
  2. SabioBBi S. L
  3. Consejo Superior de Deportes (CSD) [UPR10/10]
  4. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS) [PI061183]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education [EX-2007-1124]
  6. Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gomez-Gallego F, Ruiz JR, Buxens A, Altmae S, Artieda M, Santiago C, Gonzalez-Freire M, Verde Z, Arteta D, Martinez A, Tejedor D, Lao JI, Arenas J, Lucia A. Are elite endurance athletes genetically predisposed to lower disease risk? Physiol Genomics 41: 82-90, 2010. First published December 22, 2009; doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00183.2009.-We compared a polygenic profile that combined 33 disease risk-related mutations and polymorphisms among nonathletic healthy control subjects and elite endurance athletes. The study sample comprised 100 healthy Spanish male nonathletic ( sedentary) control subjects and 100 male elite endurance athletes. We analyzed 33 disease risk-related mutations and polymorphisms. We computed a health-related total genotype score (TGS, 0-100) from the accumulated combination of the 33 variants. We did not observe significant differences in genotype or allele distributions among groups, except for the rs4994 polymorphism ( P < 0.001). The computed health-related TGS was similar among groups (23.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 24.2 +/- 0.8 in control subjects and athletes, respectively; P = 0.553). Similar results were obtained when computing specific TGSs for each main disease category ( cardiovascular disease and cancer). We observed no evidence that male elite endurance athletes are genetically predisposed to have lower disease risk than matched nonathletic control subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available