4.5 Article

Regulatory T cell-mediated resolution of lung injury: identification of potential target genes via expression profiling

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 109-119

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00131.2009

Keywords

mouse; repair; T lymphocyte

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-089346]
  2. Johns Hopkins Bayview Scholars Program
  3. Mary Beryl Patch Turnbull Scholar Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aggarwal NR, D'Alessio FR, Tsushima K, Sidhaye VK, Cheadle C, Grigoryev DN, Barnes KC, King LS. Regulatory T cell-mediated resolution of lung injury: identification of potential target genes via expression profiling. Physiol Genomics 41: 109-119, 2010. First published December 22, 2009; doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00131.2009.-In animal models of acute lung injury (ALI), gene expression studies have focused on the acute phase of illness, with little emphasis on resolution. In this study, the acute phase of intratracheal lipopolysaccharide (IT LPS)-induced lung injury was similar in wild-type (WT) and recombinase-activating gene-1-deficient (Rag-1(-/-)) lymphocyte-deficient mice, but resolution was impaired and resolution-phase lung gene expression remained different from baseline only in Rag-1(-/-) mice. By focusing on groups of genes involved in similar biological processes (gene ontologies) pertinent to inflammation and the immune response, we identified 102 genes at days 4 and 10 after IT LPS with significantly different expression between WT and Rag-1(-/-) mice. After adoptive transfer of isolated CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) to Rag-1(-/-) mice at the time of IT LPS, resolution was similar to that in WT mice. Of the 102 genes distinctly changed in either WT or Rag-1' mice from our 7 gene ontologies, 19 genes reverted from the Rag-1(-/-) to the WT pattern of expression after adoptive transfer of Tregs, implicating those 19 genes in Treg-mediated resolution of ALI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available