4.4 Article

Effects of water and iron content on the rheological contrast between garnet and olivine

Journal

PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
Volume 166, Issue 1-2, Pages 57-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2007.10.004

Keywords

rheological contrast; water; garnet; olivine; geochemical reservoir; upper mantle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of water and iron content on the relative creep strengths of garnet and olivine were investigated by shear deformation experiments. Garnet and olivine samples were sandwiched together between alumina pistons in a simple shear geometry and were deformed at P = 1-2 GPa, T = 1473 K and strain rates ranging from 10(-5) to 10(-3) s(-1) using a Griggs-type solid-medium apparatus. The stress- and strain-rate relation, as well as the deformation microstructures including lattice-preferred orientation and dynamic recrystallization, indicates that the deformation by dislocation creep. The creep tests show that the Fe-rich garnet (AlM(67)Prp(29)Grs(3)) was slightly weaker than olivine (Fo90), whereas the Mg-rich garnet (Alm(19)Prp(68)Grs(12)) was significantly stronger than olivine under dry conditions. The wet experiments show that the creep rate of the Mg-rich garnet is more sensitive to water than olivine; the water fugacity exponent on strain rate was estimated to be similar to 2.4 for garnet and similar to 1.2 for olivine, and the Mg-rich garnet becomes weaker than olivine in a water-rich environment. The experimental results show that the theological contrast between garnet and olivine depends strongly on water content and to a lesser degree on Fe content. Consequently, the geodynamic behavior of geochemical reservoirs can be sensitive to their chemical environments in the upper mantle. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available