4.7 Article

Zero-energy neutron-triton and proton-Helium-3 scattering with EFT(π)

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 721, Issue 4-5, Pages 335-341

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.03.028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-93ER40756]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-93ER40756] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Model-independent constraints for the neutron-triton and proton-Helium-3 scattering lengths are calculated with a leading-order interaction derived from an effective field theory without explicit pions. Using the singlet neutron-proton scattering length, the deuteron-, and triton binding energy as input, the predictions a(s) (t-n) = 9.2 +/- 2.6 fm, a(t)(t-n) = 7.6 +/- 1.6 fm, a(s)(C)(He-3-p) = 3.6 +/- 0.32 fm, and a(t)(C)(He-3-p) = 3.1 +/- 0.23 fm are obtained. The calculations employ the resonating group method and include the Coulomb interaction when appropriate. The theoretical uncertainty is assessed via a variation of the regulator parameter of the short-distance interaction from 400 MeV to 1.6 GeV. The phase-shift and scattering-length results for the proton-Helium-3 system are consistent with a recent phase shift analysis and with model calculations. For neutron-triton, the results for the scattering lengths in both singlet and triplet channels are significantly smaller than suggested by R-matrix and partial-wave-analysis extractions from data. For a better understanding of this discrepancy, the sensitivity of the low-energy four-body scattering system to variations in the neutron-neutron and proton-proton two-nucleon scattering lengths is calculated. Induced by strong charge-symmetry-breaking contact interactions, this dependence is found insignificant. In contrast, a strong correlation between the neutron-triton scattering length and the triton binding energy analogous to the Phillips line is found. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available