4.7 Article

Search for a diffuse flux of high-energy νμ with the ANTARES neutrino telescope

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 696, Issue 1-2, Pages 16-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.11.070

Keywords

Neutrino telescope; Diffuse muon neutrino flux; ANTARES

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. Commissariat a l'energie atomique et aux energies alternatives (CEA)
  3. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)
  4. Commission Europenne
  5. Region Alsace
  6. Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur
  7. Departement du Var and Ville de La Seyne-sur-Mer, France
  8. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany
  9. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  10. Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)
  11. Nederlandse organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), The Netherlands
  12. Council of the President of the Russian Federation, Russia
  13. National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS), Romania
  14. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN)
  15. Prometeo of Generalitat Valenciana (GVA)
  16. MultiDark, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A search for a diffuse flux of astrophysical muon neutrinos, using data collected by the ANTARES neutrino telescope is presented. A (0.83 x 2 pi) sr sky was monitored for a total of 334 days of equivalent live time. The searched signal corresponds to an excess of events, produced by astrophysical sources, over the expected atmospheric neutrino background. The observed number of events is found compatible with the background expectation. Assuming an E-2 flux spectrum, a 90% c.l. upper limit on the diffuse nu(mu) flux of E-2 Phi(90%) = 5.3 x 10(-8) GeV cm(-2) s(-1) sr(-1) in the energy range 20 TeV-2.5 PeV is obtained. Other signal models with different energy spectra are also tested and some rejected. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available