4.6 Article

Sparse-view x-ray CT reconstruction via total generalized variation regularization

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 12, Pages 2997-3017

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/12/2997

Keywords

x-ray; sparse-view; total variation; total generalized variation; regularization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101046, 81371544, 61262026]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China [2011A030300005]
  3. 973 Program of China [2010CB732504]
  4. NIH/NCI [CA143111, CA082402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sparse-view CT reconstruction algorithms via total variation (TV) optimize the data iteratively on the basis of a noise- and artifact-reducing model, resulting in significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining image quality. However, the piecewise constant assumption of TV minimization often leads to the appearance of noticeable patchy artifacts in reconstructed images. To obviate this drawback, we present a penalized weighted least-squares (PWLS) scheme to retain the image quality by incorporating the new concept of total generalized variation (TGV) regularization. We refer to the proposed scheme as 'PWLS-TGV' for simplicity. Specifically, TGV regularization utilizes higher order derivatives of the objective image, and the weighted least-squares term considers data-dependent variance estimation, which fully contribute to improving the image quality with sparse-view projection measurement. Subsequently, an alternating optimization algorithm was adopted to minimize the associative objective function. To evaluate the PWLS-TGV method, both qualitative and quantitative studies were conducted by using digital and physical phantoms. Experimental results show that the present PWLS-TGV method can achieve images with several noticeable gains over the original TV-based method in terms of accuracy and resolution properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available