4.6 Article

Iterative image reconstruction for cerebral perfusion CT using a pre-contrast scan induced edge-preserving prior

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 22, Pages 7519-7542

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/7519

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81000613, 81101046]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAI12B03]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China [2011A030300005, 2011YQ03011404]
  4. 973 Program of China [2010CB732503]
  5. NIH/NCI [CA143111, CA082402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerebral perfusion x-ray computed tomography (PCT) imaging, which detects and characterizes the ischemic penumbra, and assesses blood-brain barrier permeability with acute stroke or chronic cerebrovascular diseases, has been developed extensively over the past decades. However, due to its sequential scan protocol, the associated radiation dose has raised significant concerns to patients. Therefore, in this study we developed an iterative image reconstruction algorithm based on the maximum a posterior (MAP) principle to yield a clinically acceptable cerebral PCT image with lower milliampere-seconds (mA s). To preserve the edges of the reconstructed image, an edge-preserving prior was designed using a normal-dose pre-contrast unenhanced scan. For simplicity, the present algorithm was termed as 'MAP-ndiNLM'. Evaluations with the digital phantom and the simulated low-dose clinical brain PCT datasets clearly demonstrate that the MAP-ndiNLM method can achieve more significant gains than the existing FBP and MAP-Huber algorithms with better image noise reduction, low-contrast object detection and resolution preservation. More importantly, the MAP-ndiNLM method can yield more accurate kinetic enhanced details and diagnostic hemodynamic parameter maps than the MAP-Huber method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available