4.5 Article

The diversity and relationship of prion protein self-replicating states

Journal

VIRUS RESEARCH
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 113-119

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.10.002

Keywords

Prion protein; Prion diseases; Amyloid fibrils; Deformed templating; Synthetic prions; Protein misfolding cyclic amplification

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [NS045585, NS074998]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has become evident that the prion protein (PrP) can form a diverse range of self-replicating structures in addition to bona fide PrPSc or strain-specific PrPSc variants. Some self-replicating states can be only produced in vitro, whereas others can be formed in vivo and in vitro. While transmissible, not all states that replicate in vivo are truly pathogenic. Some of them can replicate silently without causing symptoms or clinical diseases. In the current article we discuss the data on PK-digestion patterns of different self-replicating PrP states in connection with other structural data available to date and assess possible relationships between different self-replicating states. Even though different self-replicating PrP states appear to have significantly different global folding patterns, it seems that the C-terminal region exhibits a cross-beta-sheet structure in all self-replicating states, as this region acquires the proteolytically most stable conformation. We also discuss the possibility of the transformation of self-replicating states and triggering of PrPSc formation within the frame of the deformed templating model. The spread of silent self-replicating states is of a particular concern because they can lead to transmissible prion disease. Moreover, examples on how different replication requirements favor different states are discussed. This knowledge can help in designing conditions for selective amplification of a particular PrP state in vitro. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available