3.9 Article

Demonstration of low emittance in the Cornell energy recovery linac injector prototype

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.073401

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR-0807731]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-SC0003965]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0003965] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a detailed study of the six-dimensional phase space of the electron beam produced by the Cornell Energy Recovery Linac Photoinjector, a high-brightness, high repetition rate (1.3 GHz) DC photoemission source designed to drive a hard x-ray energy recovery linac (ERL). A complete simulation model of the injector has been constructed, verified by measurement, and optimized. Both the horizontal and vertical 2D transverse phase spaces, as well as the time-resolved (sliced) horizontal phase space, were simulated and directly measured at the end of the injector for 19 and 77 pC bunches at roughly 8 MeV. These bunch charges were chosen because they correspond to 25 and 100 mA average current if operating at the full 1.3 GHz repetition rate. The resulting 90% normalized transverse emittances for 19 (77) pC/bunch were 0.23 +/- 0.02 (0.51 +/- 0.04) mu m in the horizontal plane, and 0.14 +/- 0.01 (0.29 +/- 0.02) mu m in the vertical plane, respectively. These emittances were measured with a corresponding bunch length of 2.1 +/- 0.1 (3.0 +/- 0.2) ps, respectively. In each case the rms momentum spread was determined to be on the order of 10(-3). Excellent overall agreement between measurement and simulation has been demonstrated. Using the emittances and bunch length measured at 19 pC/bunch, we estimate the electron beam quality in a 1.3 GHz, 5 GeV hard x-ray ERL to be at least a factor of 20 times better than that of existing storage rings when the rms energy spread of each device is considered. These results represent a milestone for the field of high-brightness, high-current photoinjectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available