4.8 Article

Achieving Heisenberg-Scaling Precision with Projective Measurement on Single Photons

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.060506

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0304100, 2016YFA0302700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61327901, 91536113, 11474159, 61490711, 11774335, 91536219]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDYSSW-SLH003]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2030020019, WK2470000026, 021314380079]
  5. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies [AHY020100, AHY060300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been suggested that both quantum superpositions and nonlinear interactions are important resources for quantum metrology. However, to date the different roles that these two resources play in the precision enhancement are not well understood. Here, we experimentally demonstrate a Heisenberg-scaling metrology to measure the parameter governing the nonlinear coupling between two different optical modes. The intense mode with n (more than 10(6) in our work) photons manifests its effect through the nonlinear interaction strength which is proportional to its average photon number. The superposition state of the weak mode, which contains only a single photon, is responsible for both the linear Hamiltonian and the scaling of the measurement precision. By properly preparing the initial state of single photon and making projective photon-counting measurements, the extracted classical Fisher information (FI) can saturate the quantum FI embedded in the combined state after coupling, which is similar to n(2) and leads to a practical precision similar or equal to 1.2/n. Free from the utilization of entanglement, our work paves a way to realize Heisenberg-scaling precision when only a linear Hamiltonian is involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available