4.7 Article

The equilibrium crystal shape of strontium titanate and its relationship to the grain boundary plane distribution

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 32-40

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.065

Keywords

Equilibrium crystal shape; Grain boundary plane distribution; Surface energy; Strontium titanate; Binding energy

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [BA4143/2]
  2. ONR-MURI [N00014-11-1-0678]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the equilibrium crystal shape (ECS) of a model system, strontium titanate, is compared with the grain boundary plane distribution (GBPD) as a function of temperature. Strontium titanate has a pronounced surface energy anisotropy and a grain growth anomaly, with the grain growth rate decreasing by orders of magnitude with increasing temperature. The ECS was determined from the shape of small intragranular pores and the GBPD was determined from orientation measurements on surfaces, with the relative areas of grain boundary planes in a polycrystal correlated to the surface energy of both adjacent crystal planes. The grain boundary energy has been previously proposed to be the sum of the surface energy of the adjacent grains less a binding energy that is assumed to be constant. While much experimental evidence exists for this assumption at a fixed temperature, the influence of temperature is not known. While the anisotropy of the ECS was found to decrease with temperature, the anisotropy of the GBPD increased with temperature. These findings indicate that changes in the binding energy with temperature must be considered, as the binding energy links the surface energy to the grain boundary energy. The results are discussed with respect to the grain growth anomaly of strontium titanate, in which the grain growth decreases with increasing temperature. (C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available