4.7 Article

Driven particle in a random landscape: Disorder correlator, avalanche distribution, and extreme value statistics of records

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.051105

Keywords

elasticity; random processes; renormalisation; Weibull distribution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We review how the renormalized force correlator Delta(u), the function computed in the functional renormalization-group (RG) field theory, can be measured directly in numerics and experiments on the dynamics of elastic manifolds in the presence of pinning disorder. We show how this function can be computed analytically for a particle dragged through a one-dimensional random-force landscape. The limit of small velocity allows one to access the critical behavior at the depinning transition. For uncorrelated forces one finds three universality classes, corresponding to the three extreme value statistics, Gumbel, Weibull, and Frechet. For each class we obtain analytically the universal function Delta(u), the corrections to the critical force, and the joint probability distribution of avalanche sizes s and waiting times w. We find P(s)=P(w) for all three cases. All results are checked numerically. For a Brownian force landscape, known as the Alessandro, Beatrice, Bertotti, and Montorsi (ABBM) model, avalanche distributions and Delta(u) can be computed for any velocity. For two-dimensional disorder, we perform large-scale numerical simulations to calculate the renormalized force correlator tensor Delta(ij)(u), and to extract the anisotropic scaling exponents zeta(x)>zeta(y). We also show how the Middleton theorem is violated. Our results are relevant for the record statistics of random sequences with linear trends, as encountered, e.g., in some models of global warming. We give the joint distribution of the time s between two successive records and their difference in value w.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available