Blind spots for neutralino dark matter in the MSSM with an intermediatemA
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Blind spots for neutralino dark matter in the MSSM with an intermediatemA
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Online
2014-07-17
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.90.015018
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Effective Field Theory for Heavy Weakly Interacting Massive Particles Scattering with Nucleons
- (2014) Richard J. Hill et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- First Results from the LUX Dark Matter Experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility
- (2014) D. S. Akerib et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos in events with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector
- (2014) G. Aad et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Testing the muon g-2 anomaly at the LHC
- (2014) A. Freitas et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Search for new physics in the multijet and missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at $ \sqrt{s} $ = 8 TeV
- (2014) S. Chatrchyan et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Impersonating the Standard Model Higgs boson: alignment without decoupling
- (2014) Marcela Carena et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- NINE-YEARWILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
- (2013) G. Hinshaw et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
- Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD
- (2013) P. M. Junnarkar et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Supersymmetric heavy Higgs bosons at the LHC
- (2013) Alexandre Arbey et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- IceCube search for dark matter annihilation in nearby galaxies and galaxy clusters
- (2013) M. G. Aartsen et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Direct search of dark matter in high-scale supersymmetry
- (2013) Junji Hisano et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- XENON100 implications for naturalness in the MSSM, NMSSM, andλ-supersymmetry model
- (2013) Maxim Perelstein et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- First Result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: Precision Measurement of the Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays of 0.5–350 GeV
- (2013) M. Aguilar et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Naturalness of neutralino dark matter
- (2013) Philipp Grothaus et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Indirect probes of the MSSM after the Higgs discovery
- (2013) Wolfgang Altmannshofer et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data
- (2012) E. Aprile et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Universal behavior in the scattering of heavy, weakly interacting dark matter on nuclear targets
- (2012) Richard J. Hill et al. PHYSICS LETTERS B
- Implications of Xenon100 and LHC results for Dark Matter models
- (2011) Marco Farina et al. NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
- Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope
- (2011) M. Ackermann et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- The MSSM confronts the precision electroweak data and the muon g − 2
- (2011) Gi-Chol Cho et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider
- (2011) Howard Baer et al. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
- PAMELA Results on the Cosmic-Ray Antiproton Flux from 60 MeV to 180 GeV in Kinetic Energy
- (2010) O. Adriani et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Minimal flavor violation and the scale of supersymmetry breaking
- (2009) M. Carena et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Jet Substructure as a New Higgs-Search Channel at the Large Hadron Collider
- (2008) Jonathan M. Butterworth et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started