Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.076001
Keywords
-
Funding
- Basque Government [IT-472-10]
- Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain [FIS2009-12773-C02-01]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Following the renewed interest in the topic [Halliwell and Yearsley, Phys. Rev. D 86, 024016 (2012)], we revisit the problem of assigning probabilities to classes of Feynman paths passing through specified space-time regions. We show that by assigning probabilities to interfering alternatives, one already makes the assumption that the interference has been destroyed through interacting with the environment or a meter. Including the effects of the meter allows one to construct a consistent theory, free of logical pitfalls,'' such as those identified in Halliwell and Yearsley. Wherever a meter cannot be constructed, or cannot be set to effect the desired decoherence, formally constructed probabilities have no clear physical meaning and can violate the necessary sum rules. We illustrate the above approach by analysing the three examples considered in Halliwell and Yearsley. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.076001
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available